Home | Abstract | Intro | Page 1 | Page 2 | Results | Conclusions | References | Acknowledgements

Results:

HEC-HMS produces an output for the 2-year 24-hour storm that is summarized Table 10: 

Table 10 - HEC-HMS Output for the 2-Year Event, Basin 1 Only

Hydrologic Element Discharge Peak
cfs
Time of Peak Total Volume
acre-ft
Drainage Area
mi2
Sub-basin 5 90.0 17 Dec 02 00:15 10.26 0.215
Reach 1 89.3 17 Dec 02 00:15 10.24 0.215
Sub-basin 1 29.4 17 Dec 02 00:35 5.06 0.107
Sub-basin 7 188.9 16 Dec 02 23:55 11.14 0.232
Sub-basin 2 52.6 17 Dec 02 00:25 7.65 0.161
Sub-basin 6 156.3 16 Dec 02 23:55 9.22 0.192
Sub-basin 3 91.6 17 Dec 02 00:20 12.23 0.257
Sub-basin 4 36.6 16 Dec 02 24:00 2.43 0.051
Sink 1 449.3 16 Dec 02 23:55 57.98 1.22

Total volume of runoff contributed, time of peak, and peak flows are calculated via a simulation for the 2-year 24-hour storm.  Peak flows occur around midnight on December 16 for all sub-basins – approximately 12 hours after the storm begins.

After simulation of 3 types of storms with 2 different basin models, the following results were obtained for total volume runoff to the lake.  Peak discharge flows are calculated at the sink (ditch entrance into the lake):

Table 11 - HEC-HMS Output Summary

Scenario Event Storm Peak Discharge
cfs
Peak Time  Total Volume Added
acre-ft
Drainage Area
mi2
           
  2 Year 439 12/16/02 23:55 58.0 1.22
50 Year 1400 12/16/02 23:55 179 1.22
100 Year 1810 12/16/02 23:55 229 1.22
           
  2 Year 463 12/16/02 24:00 81.9 1.72
50 Year 1480 12/16/02 23:55 253 1.72
100 Year 1910 12/16/02 23:55 323 1.72

In addition to calculating water contributions from land runoff, it is crucial to add the volume of water that falls directly on the lake surface.  For a lake area of 134 acres (see Table 1), the volume of water added can be calculated for each event storm:

 Table 12 – Volume of Water Added Through Direct Precipitation on the Lake

Event Storm Precipitation
in
Volume Added
acre-ft
2-Year 2.7 30.2
50-Year 5.5 61.4
100-Year 6.5 72.6

Compiling this information with data from Table 11 gives us a grand total of volume added to the lake for each storm, with and without runoff from Basin 2.  This data is shown in Table 13.

Table 13 – Final Results

Scenario Event Storm  Total Volume
acre-ft
Total Volume
m2
       
Basin 1 2 Year 88.2 109,000
50 Year 240 296,000
100 Year 302 373,000
       
Basin 1 & 2 Combined 2 Year 112 138,000
50 Year 314 387,000
100 Year 396 489,000

Malcolm Pirnie created an elevation-volume relationship in their TMDL report.  Based on this relationship, when a specified volume is added to the lake, elevation can be predicted.  These can be seen in Tables 14 and 15 and Figures O and P, which predict lake elevation in response to 2-year, 50-year and 100-year 24-hour event storms. 

It is important to note that peak runoff of sub-basins 8, 9 and 10 (those that discharge into the ditch) sometimes exceed the ditch’s capacity of 45 cfs.  Cross sections will need to be repaired in order to accommodate peak flows:

Table 16 - Ditch Overflow Data

Hydrologic Element Discharge Peak Time of Peak Total Volume Drainage Area
2-Year        
Subbasin-9 52.5 17 Dec 02  00:25 7.60 0.160
Reach-2 52.2 17 Dec 02  00:35 7.57 0.160
Subbasin-8 136 17 Dec 02  00:10 13.3 0.278
Ditch 1 151 17 Dec 02  00:20 20.8 0.438
Subbasin-10 24.6 17 Dec 02  00:20 3.18 0.0670
Ditch 2 173 17 Dec 02  00:20 240 0.505
50-Year        
Subbasin-9 166 17 Dec 02  00:25 23.5 0.160
Reach-2 166 17 Dec 02  00:35 23.4 0.160
Subbasin-8 429 17 Dec 02  00:10 41.0 0.278
Ditch 1 479 17 Dec 02  00:20 64.2 0.438
Subbasin-10 78.1 17 Dec 02  00:15 9.80 0.067
Ditch 2 549 17 Dec 02  00:20 73.9 0.505
100-Year        
Subbasin-9 213 17 Dec 02  00:25 30.0 0.160
Reach-2 213 17 Dec 02  00:35 29.9 0.160
Subbasin-8 550 17 Dec 02  00:10 52.4 0.278
Ditch 1 616 17 Dec 02  00:20 82.1 0.438
Subbasin-10 100.5 17 Dec 02  00:15 12.5 0.067
Ditch 2 707 17 Dec 02  00:20 94.6 0.505

 

Even though the ditch cannot currently accommodate peak runoff flows, I assumed full capture of runoff from the watershed in order to create a worst-case scenario in terms of possible flood damage (to homes on the lakefront).  In addition, these values create estimates that may aid in upgrading the ditch in the future if the homeowners wish to capture all potential runoff from the adjacent basin.

 

Home | Abstract | Intro | Page 1 | Page 2 | Results | Conclusions | References | Acknowledgements